International Journal of School Health

Published by: Kowsar

Developing a Fuzzy Clustering-Based Method for Categorizing Young Adolescent Students Based on Their Empathy Scores and Exploring the Relationship Between Their Empathy and Learning Behaviors

Samaneh Sadat Musavian 1 , * , Hashem Fardanesh 1 and Ebrahim Talaee 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Human Science, Tarbiat Moderes University, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of School Health: January 2019, 6 (1); e82604
  • Published Online: November 11, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 25, 2018
  • Revised: September 24, 2018
  • Accepted: September 26, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/intjsh.82604

To Cite: Musavian S S, Fardanesh H, Talaee E. Developing a Fuzzy Clustering-Based Method for Categorizing Young Adolescent Students Based on Their Empathy Scores and Exploring the Relationship Between Their Empathy and Learning Behaviors, Int J School Health. 2019 ; 6(1):e82604. doi: 10.5812/intjsh.82604.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, International Journal of School Health. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. [PubMed: 24454995]. [PubMed Central: PMC3886444].
  • 2. Dweck CS. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press; 2013.
  • 3. Dragon T, Arroyo I, Woolf BP, Burleson W, El Kaliouby R, Eydgahi H. Viewing student affect and learning through classroom observation and physical sensors. International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer; 2008. p. 29-39.
  • 4. Gil MÁ, González-Rodríguez G. Fuzzy vs. Likert scale in statistics. 271. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24666-1_27.
  • 5. Zoll C, Enz S. A questionnaire to assess affective and cognitive empathy in children. Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg; 2010.
  • 6. McDermott PA, Rikoon SH, Waterman C, Fantuzzo JW. The preschool learning behaviors scale: Dimensionality and external validity in head start. Sch Psychol Re. 2012;41(1):66.
  • 7. Stott DH. Learning style or 'intelligence'? Sch Psychol Int. 2016;6(3):167-74. doi: 10.1177/0143034385063007.
  • 8. Barnett DW, Bauer AM, Ehrhardt KE, Lentz FE, Stollar SA. Keystone targets for change: Planning for widespread positive consequences. Sch Psychol Q. 1996;11(2):95-117. doi: 10.1037/h0088923.
  • 9. DiPerna JC, Elliott SN. Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievenment: An introdution to the mini-series. Sch Psychol Rev. 2002;31(3):293.
  • 10. van der Veen I, Peetsma T. The development in self-regulated learning behaviour of first-year students in the lowest level of secondary school in the Netherlands. Learn Individ Differ. 2009;19(1):34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.001.
  • 11. McDermott PA, Green LF, Francis JM, Stott DH. Learning behaviors scale. Philadelphia, PA: ASCA, Edumetric and Clinical Science; 1999.
  • 12. Worrell FC, Vandiver BJ, Watkins MW. Construct validity of the learning behavior scale with an independent sample of students. Psychol Sch. 2001;38(3):207-15. doi: 10.1002/pits.1011.
  • 13. Worrell FC, Schaefer BA. Reliability and validity of learning behaviors scale (lbs) scores with academically talented students: A comparative perspective. Gift Child Q. 2016;48(4):287-308. doi: 10.1177/001698620404800404.
  • 14. Canivez GL, Willenborg E, Kearney A. Replication of the learning behaviors scale factor structure with an independent sample. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2006;24(2):97-111. doi: 10.1177/0734282905285239.
  • 15. Ciucci E, Liu J, Qiao X, Dong F, Raine A. The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors. Plos One. 2018;13(5). e0195268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195268.
  • 16. Li Q. A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40(5):1609-18. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.015.
  • 17. Vonglao P. Application of fuzzy logic to improve the Likert scale to measure latent variables. Kasetsart J Soc Sci. 2017;38(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.01.002.
  • 18. Hirasawa S, Fu-Yih S, Wei-Tzen Y. Student questionnaire analyses for class management by text mining both in Japanese and in Chinese. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Montreal, Que., Canada. IEEE; 2007. p. 398-405.
  • 19. Ishida T, Hamada H, Kumoi G, Goto M, Hirasawa S. Student questionnaire analyses using the clustering method based on the PLSI model. International Conference in Management Sciences and Decision Making. Taipei. 2009.
  • 20. Musavian SS, Ahmadi A. Assessment of laboratory courses using fuzzy reasoning. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. 2013;6(5):533-7.
  • 21. Abedi A, Hadipour M, Shooshtari M, Jafari Harandi R, Shafiei E. [An assessment of reliability, validity, and factor structure of Persian form of learning behaviors scale on middle school students]. Educ Meas. 2013;3(12):23-40. Persian.
  • 22. Nanda S. Are there gender differences in empathy. Undergraduate J Psychol Berkeley. 2013;7:22-42.
  • 23. Baez S, Flichtentrei D, Prats M, Mastandueno R, Garcia AM, Cetkovich M, et al. Men, women...who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS One. 2017;12(6). e0179336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179336. [PubMed: 28632770]. [PubMed Central: PMC5478130].
  • 24. Zupan B, Neumann D, Babbage D, Willer B. Sex-based differences in affective and cognitive empathy following severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2018;32(5):554-63. doi: 10.1037/neu0000462. [PubMed: 29952609].
  • 25. Feshbach ND, Feshbach S. Affective processes and academic achievement. Child Dev. 1987;58(5):1335-47. [PubMed: 3665649].
  • 26. Dotterer AM, Lowe K. Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2011;40(12):1649-60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5. [PubMed: 21400208].
  • 27. Wentzel KR, Weinberger DA, Ford ME, Feldman SS. Academic achievement in preadolescence: The role of motivational, affective, and self-regulatory processes. J Appl Dev Psychol. 1990;11(2):179-93. doi: 10.1016/0193-3973(90)90004-4.
  • 28. Reyes MR, Brackett MA, Rivers SE, White M, Salovey P. Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. J Educat Psychol. 2012;104(3):700-12. doi: 10.1037/a0027268.
  • 29. Decety JE, Ickes WE. The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press; 2009.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments